2:24-cv-04247•Muhammad v. The Kroger Co. et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HANEEF MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. THE KROGER CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action 2:24-cv-4247 Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Video Evidence of Minor Child’s Statement Before City Council (ECF No. 39). Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, because Plaintiff is not offering the video evidence in support of any identified pending motion or hearing. If Plaintiff wishes to submit the video evidence in support of a future motion or hearing, Plaintiff may renew his motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Chelsey M. Vascura CHELSEY M. VASCURA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case: 2:24-cv-04247-MHW-CMV Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/26/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.