Sivi v. Franklin County Guardianship Service Board et al

2:24-cv-04191Ohsd24.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Meredith Sivi, 	Case No. 2:24-cv-4191
Plaintiff, 	Judge Graham
v. 	Magistrate Judge Jolson
Franklin County Guardianship Service
Board, et al.,
Defendants.
Order
Plaintiff Meredith Sivi has moved for a stay of the litigation, among other requests. 	The
motion is based on her perception that certain individuals (who are not named defendants) are
engaging in a conspiracy to conduct surveillance of her, retaliate against her, and interfere with her
ability to litigate this action. Somewhat confusingly, plaintiff also asks that the pending motions for
judgment on the pleadings filed by all three defendants be converted into motions for summary
judgment.
The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to show good cause to stay the litigation or convert
the pending motions into motions for summary judgment. 	Two of the pending motions are fully
briefed and ripe for judicial adjudication. The third was filed by defendant Upreach LLC on January
27, 2026. Plaintiff has not filed a response brief to Upreach’s motion, and the deadline has now passed
for her to do so. In an abundance of caution, the Court will allow plaintiff an additional opportunity
to respond to Upreach’s motion.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for a stay (Doc. 105) is DENIED. If plaintiff wishes to file a
brief in response to Upreach’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, it must be received by the Court
no later than March 5, 2026. In such instance, Upreach may file a reply brief no later than March 10,
2026.
s/ James L. Graham
JAMES L. GRAHAM
United States District Judge
DATE: February 24, 2026
Case: 2:24-cv-04191-JLG-KAJ Doc #: 107 Filed: 02/24/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.