Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
GRADY KRZYWKOWSKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
MIKE DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action 2:24-cv-3902
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion seeking to file a thirty-five-page
Response in Opposition to Defendants’ forty-two-page Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF
No. 134.) Plaintiff explains that additional pages are necessary because Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment is made on behalf of eight Defendants and raises complex issues, including
a qualified immunity defense. Accordingly, for good cause shown, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No.
134) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is permitted to file a Response in Opposition that does not exceed
thirty-five pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura
CHELSEY M. VASCURA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 2:24-cv-03902-MHW-CMV Doc #: 136 Filed: 11/24/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>