1:25-cv-00696•Jackson v. Eakes et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI MELINDA JEAN JACKSON, Case No. l:25-cv-696 Plaintiff, Judge Matthew W. McFarland V. STEPHANIE EAKES, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4) The Court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred. Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) and ORDERS the following: 1) The Magistrate Judge provided Plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint within thirty days from the date of the Report and Recommendation. This timeframe has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2) The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and hereby DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma Case: 1:25-cv-00696-MWM-KLL Doc #: 5 Filed: 12/01/25 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
pauperis in the Court of Appeals; and
3) This matter is hereby TERMINATED from the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
B~ 'W,?{~
JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND
2
Case: 1:25-cv-00696-MWM-KLL Doc #: 5 Filed: 12/01/25 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.