1:25-cv-00621•Menchen v. Express Scripts et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
JOHN MENCHEN, Plaintiff, vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI Case No. l:25-cv-621 Judge Matthew W. McFarland EXPRESS SCRIPTS, et al., Defendants. ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 6), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Furthermore, the Court CERTIFIES that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. This matter is hereby TERMINATED from the Court's docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case: 1:25-cv-00621-MWM-SKB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/13/25 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO By: --1-(~__:W ril--l q-&·!JUDGE MA ITHEW W. McFARLAND Case: 1:25-cv-00621-MWM-SKB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/13/25 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.