1:25-cv-00088•Franklin v. Talbert House Crisis et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION QUEEN CHARLOTTE FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, vs. TALBERT HOUSE CRISIS, et al., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:25-cv-88 Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on February 25, 2025. No objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Having carefully reviewed the comprehensive findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and finding no clear error, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (advisory committee notes from 1983 amendment) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation”); see e.g., Roane v. Warden of Corr. Reception Ctr., No. 2:22-cv-2768, 2022 WL 16535903, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2022). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff is WARNED that she is highly likely to be deemed vexatious and made subject to prefiling limitations if she persists in filing additional cases that lack any reasonable basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and/or that are factually and legally frivolous under screening standards. Case: 1:25-cv-00088-JPH-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would lack an arguable basis in law or in fact and thus would not be taken in good faith. The Court accordingly DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5), Plaintiff remains free to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999). IT IS SO ORDERED. October 8, 2026 Jeffery P. Hopkins United States District Judge Case: 1:25-cv-00088-JPH-SKB Doc #: 10 Filed: 10/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.