Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al

1:22-cv-00453Ohsd28.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
TERRANCE J. FEASTER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:22-cv-453
District Judge Susan J. Dlott
Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
ORDER
This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment
of Counsel. (Doc. #83). In his Motion, Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel, alleging that
the conditions at Southern Ohio Correctional Facility are worse than when he filed this case. Id.
at 663. He also indicates that he has filed grievances and attempted to confer with Defendants’
counsel, B. Alexander, to redress or resolve his issues but has been unsuccessful. Id.
Plaintiff previously requested appointment of counsel in March 2023. 	(Doc. #9). 	In
October 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s request. (Doc. #17).
The United States Constitution does not require the appointment of counsel for indigent
plaintiffs in civil cases such as this, and Congress has not provided funds with which to compensate
attorneys who might agree to represent those plaintiffs. Moreover, there are not enough attorneys
who can absorb the costs of representing persons on a voluntary basis to permit the Court to appoint
an attorney for all who file cases on their own behalf.
The Court makes every effort to appoint counsel in civil cases which proceed to trial and
in exceptional circumstances will attempt to appoint counsel at an earlier stage of a civil case. See
Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-06 (6th Cir. 1993).
Case: 1:22-cv-00453-SJD-PBS Doc #: 103 Filed: 01/28/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2
To date, Plaintiff has adequately represented himself in this matter. 	Moreover, Plaintiff
has failed to demonstrate the type of exceptional circumstances that would justify the rare
appointment of free counsel for a pro se civil litigant.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.
#83) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 28, 2026 	s/Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
Peter B. Silvain, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 1:22-cv-00453-SJD-PBS Doc #: 103 Filed: 01/28/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.