4:25-cv-01683•Lassiter v. State of Ohio
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOEL LASSITER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:25-cv-1683 Judge J. Philip Calabrese Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong OPINION AND ORDER The Court has now considered the case of Plaintiff Joel Lassiter two times. First, when it dismissed his lawsuit against the State of Ohio, and again when he sought reconsideration. Plaintiff again seeks reconsideration. Upon review of Mr. Lassiter’s motion, it presents no arguments, facts, or developments that justify a different conclusion—either in dismissing his lawsuit or on reconsideration. Therefore, the Court DENIES this motion for reconsideration. The Court advises Plaintiff that if he persists in making frivolous filings, the Court will restrict his ability to file papers in the Northern District of Ohio. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2025 J. Philip Calabrese United States District Judge Northern District of Ohio Case: 4:25-cv-01683-JPC Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/18/25 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.