Lassiter v. State of Ohio

4:25-cv-01683Ohnd18.11.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
JOEL LASSITER,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF OHIO,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:25-cv-1683
Judge J. Philip Calabrese
Magistrate Judge
Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong
OPINION AND ORDER
The Court has now considered the case of Plaintiff Joel Lassiter two times.
First, when it dismissed his lawsuit against the State of Ohio, and again when he
sought reconsideration. 	Plaintiff again seeks reconsideration. 	Upon review of
Mr. Lassiter’s motion, it presents no arguments, facts, or developments that justify a
different 	conclusion—either 	in 	dismissing 	his 	lawsuit 	or 	on 	reconsideration.
Therefore, the Court DENIES this motion for reconsideration. 	The Court advises
Plaintiff that if he persists in making frivolous filings, the Court will restrict his
ability to file papers in the Northern District of Ohio.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 18, 2025
J. Philip Calabrese
United States District Judge
Northern District of Ohio
Case: 4:25-cv-01683-JPC Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/18/25 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.