3:07-bk-35365•Duane J Tillimon
Gesamter Gesetzestext
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 1 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 2 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 3 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 4 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 5 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 6 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 7 of 8
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 8 of 8
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
AUTHENTICATED /|
U.S. GOVERNMENT rt
INFORMATION Z| f
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
In Re: )
) JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER
Duane J. Tillimon )
) Case No. 07-35365
Debtor(s) )
)
DECISION AND ORDER
This cause comes before the Court on its own Motion. For said Motion, the Court, given the
procedural posture of the case, finds that the requirement set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 111, regarding the
Debtor’s completion of a course on personal financial management, should be waived and that a
discharge should be forthwith entered. The basis for this decision is set forth below.
FACTS
On December 10, 2007, the Debtor, Duane J. Tillimon, filed a petition in this Court for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. (Doc. No. 1). In filing his bankruptcy case,
the Debtor submitted a certificate, showing that, as required by 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(h) and 521(b), he
had completed the requisite credit counseling course. (Doc. No. 2). The Debtor, however, has yet
to complete the financial management course as required by § 111.
At the time he filed his petition for relief, the Debtor had a fee interest in the following real
property:
(1) 1120 SOUTH CREEK LANE, TOLEDO, OH
(2) 114 ARKLOW DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(3) 14 VAN BUREN AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH
(4) 16 VAN BUREN AVENUE, TOLDEO, OH
(5) 1936 HURD STREET, TOLEDO, OH
6745365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 1of8
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
(6) 20 VAN BUREN AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH
(7) 2121 LISA LANE, TOLEDO, OH
(8) 2139 LISA LANE, TOLEDO, OH 43611
(9) 2200 GALLIER DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH (aka 4460 Suder)
(10) 2339 WINTERSET DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(11) 2902 POWHATTAN PARKWAY, TOLEDO, OH
(12) 3513 DOUGLAS ROAD, TOLEDO, OH
(13) 3634 WILLOW RUN DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(14) 3638 WILLOW RUN DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(15) 3802 HOUSE OF STUART, TOLEDO, OH
(16) 3955 BRANCH DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(17) 44-54 E. CRAWFORD AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH (aka 4903-4909 N.
Detroit)
(18) 4437 COPPER CREEK LANE, TOLEDO, OH
(19) 4445 WOODMONT ROAD, TOLDEO, OH
(20) 4602 SUDER AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH
(21) 4656 SOUTH DETROIT, TOLEDO, OH
(22) 4709 VENTURA DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(23) 5005 YORKSHIRE DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(24) 5023 OAK RIDGE DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH
(25) 560 N. BYRNE ROAD, TOLEDO, OH
(26) 570 N. BYRNE ROAD, TOLEDO, OH
(27) 580 N. BYRNE ROAD, TOLEDO, OH
The Debtor also maintained a fee interest in his residence, 5105 Tillimon Trail, Toledo, Ohio.
Against all these properties, liens — whether consensual, judicial or statutory, or a combination
thereof — are held by various third parties.
On April 25, 2008, the Court, based upon a Motion filed by the United States Trustee,
entered an order converting this case to a proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States
Page 2
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 2 of 8
07-
4
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
Bankruptcy Code. (Doc. No. 240). John N. Graham was thereafter appointed trustee of the Debtor’s
bankruptcy estate. (Doc. No. 246).
With the exception of his residence, the estate’s interest in all of the Debtor’s real property
has been abandoned. Orders, affording lien holders relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C.
§ 362(a), have also been entered for a substantial number of the Debtor’s real properties. The most
recent report submitted by the Trustee also shows that, with the exception of some choses-in-action,
all of the Debtor’s remaining interests in personal property have been abandoned from the estate.
(Doc. No. 465). In his report, the Trustee projects that this case should be fully administered and
ready for closing by November 30, 2011. Jd.
DISCUSSION
With the enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of
2005,’ individual debtors are required to complete, as a condition to obtaining the relief afforded by
the Bankruptcy Code, a prebankruptcy credit counseling course and a postfiling financial
management course. 11 U.S.C. § 111. If a debtor does not complete the prebankruptcy credit
counseling, he or she may not be a debtor in a bankruptcy case. 11 U.S.C. § 109(h). Ifa debtor does
not complete the postfiling financial management course, he or she is not entitled to receive a
discharge. 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(11) and 1328(g).
In this matter, the Debtor completed the prebankruptcy credit counseling course, thereby
qualifying him to be a debtor in bankruptcy. However, despite the passage of more than three years
since his case was filed and converted to Chapter 7, the Debtor has yet to complete the required
1
Public Law 109-8, 119 Stat. 23.
Page 3
5365-jog Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 3 of 8
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
financial management course. Based upon this deficiency, the Debtor’s case may be closed without
the entry of a discharge once the estate has been fully administered. FED.R.BANK.P. 4006. Yet,
because some estate property is still being administered by the Trustee, no such action has occurred
in this case, creating an anomalous situation.
When a bankruptcy case is commenced, an automatic stay arises. 11 U.S.C. § 362. The scope
of the stay is broad and operates to enjoin essentially any act, whether the commencement or
continuation thereof, by a creditor to collect ona prepetition claim. Inre Harchar, 393 B.R. 160, 167
(Bankr. N.D.Ohio 2008). Three types of acts are covered by the stay: (1) acts against the estate; (2)
acts against the debtor; and (3) acts against a debtor’s property.
The automatic stay, however, does last in perpetuity and, unless relief from the stay is granted
earlier, the stay will terminate by operation of law upon the occurrence of a few specified events.
First, for acts concerning property of the estate, the automatic stay terminates when the property is
no longer property of estate, an event which occurs when the property is abandoned.” 11 U.S.C.
§ 362(c)(1). Second, for acts involving the debtor and his property, the stay expires at the earlier of
the time that: (1) the case is closed, (2) the case is dismissed or (3) the debtor receives a discharge.
11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(2).
In this case, all of the Debtor’s real property, with the exception of his residence, has been
abandoned from the estate, thereby causing the stay to be relieved with respect to such property. The
same is likewise true for much of the Debtor’s personal property. Finally, concerning the Debtor’s
2
When a bankruptcy case is commenced, an estate is created comprised of all interests in
property held by the debtor at the commencement of the case. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a). In a Chapter
7 case, a trustee is then appointed to administer the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 701. Estate property will
remain within the estate until the debtor’s interest in the property is abandoned.
Page 4
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 4 of 8
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
personal interest in a number of his real properties, the record in this case reflects that orders have
been entered by the Court relieving the automatic stay.
Based upon these events, the operation of the automatic stay is now very limited in this case,
covering only those few interests still being administered by the Trustee (i.e., non-abandoned
property) and those interests of the Debtor against which the stay has not been specifically relieved
by Court order. To the extent that the automatic stay remains in effect, however, the Debtor
continues to interpose objections against parties seeking relief therefrom, a position which serves
no legitimate bankruptcy function.
First, insofar as it involves the estate’s interest in property, the Debtor generally has no
standing to object to relief from the automatic stay. Instead, only the Trustee, as the representative
of the estate, has standing to oppose relief from the stay with respect to the estate’s interest in the
property. See In re Bertka, Not Reported in B.R., 2010 WL 2756964 (Bankr. E.D.Va. 2010).
Second, concerning the application of the automatic stay to the Debtor personally, the only
reason the stay remains in effect is because this case remains open for administration and a discharge
has not yet been entered. No complaint to deny discharge or motion to dismiss this case is pending,
however. As a result, the Debtor is entitled to receive a discharge but for one fact: He has yet to
complete the course on personal financial management. Had the Debtor promptly completed the
course, his discharge would have been entered, and the automatic stay arising in his favor would
have terminated almost three years ago, most likely sometime in July of 2008.°
3
The Debtor’s case was converted to Chapter 7 on April 25, 2008. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §
348(a), the conversion of a case “constitutes an order for relief under the chapter to which the
case is converted .. . .” Bankruptcy Rule 2003(a) provides that “. . . in a chapter 7 liquidation
or a chapter 11 reorganization case, the United States trustee shall call a meeting of creditors
to be held no fewer than 21 and no more than 40 days after the order for relief.” In turn,
Page 5
07-35365-ipg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 5of8
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
Yet, absent some compelling circumstances there is no reason in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy to
have the automatic stay protect a debtor personally for such an extended period of time. The purpose
of the automatic stay is to provide the debtor with some breathing room from creditors’ collection
efforts and to “ensure the orderly liquidation of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate.” In re Russell, 441
B.R. 859, 861 (Bankr. N.D.Ohio 2010). Given the time frames discussed, the Debtor in this matter
has clearly been afforded an ample breathing spell from his creditors.
At the same time, the Debtor, ifhe delays in completing the instructional course on personal
financial management, will continue for the foreseeable future to enjoy in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy
case some of the benefits of the automatic stay. Specifically, it is noted that in his report filed with
the Court, the Trustee estimated that this case could remain open for administration until November
30, 2011. It is hard to fathom that Congress foresaw that debtors, by using the requirement of the
financial management course, could control and manipulate the duration of the automatic stay to
such an extent. As explained ina treatise addressing the function served by the financial management
course of § 111:
This new mandate was designed, at least in part, to insure that individual
debtors leave the bankruptcy process with a toolbox of financial skills so that,
prospectively, they will make more knowledgeable and thoughtful financial
choices and avoid future financial failure.
Collier on Bankruptcy { 111.01[2] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer eds., 16" ed.).
In this case, the Court, given the Debtor’s intimate involvement in his bankruptcy proceeding
and general business acumen, cannot see how the completion of the instructional course on financial
management would enable the Debtor to make more knowledgeable and thoughtful financial choices
Bankruptcy Rule 4004(a) provides that in “a chapter 7 case, a complaint, or a motion under §
727(a)(8) or (a)(9) of the Code, objecting to the debtor’s discharge shall be filed no later than
60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under § 341(a).”
Page 6
07-45365-ipg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 6 of 8
In re: Duane J. Tillimon
Case No. 07-35365
in the future. Furthermore, for the reasons explained, no purpose is served by allowing the automatic
stay to remain in effect against the Debtor personally. Based, therefore, on these findings, the Court,
in exercising its equitable powers under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), hereby waives against the Debtor the
requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 111 and § 727(a)(11), regarding the completion of a course on personal
financial management.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), the requirement that the Debtor, Duane J.
Tillimon, complete the instructional course on financial management, as set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 111,
be, and is hereby, WAIVED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, notwithstanding 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(11), the Clerk,
United States Bankruptcy Court, is hereby directed to prepare and enter the Debtor’s discharge.
Dated: May 10, 2011
lo——
Ye Richefrd L. Speer
United States
Bankruptcy Judge
Page 7
07-45365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 7 of 8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies were mailed this 10th day of May, 2011 to:
Duane J Tillimon
PO Box 8762
Toledo, OH 43623
Kenneth A Blech
10850 Pearl Rd
#D3
Strongsville, OH 44136-3305
John N Graham
5151 Monroe St
#245
Toledo, OH 43623
/s/ Jennifer Huff
Deputy Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court
07-35365-jpg Doc 491 FILED 05/10/11 ENTERED 05/10/11 16:15:02 Page 8 of 8Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.