5:25-cv-01199•Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al
Paul v. Carden, Dotzler, Hammond Law, PLLC Law Firm et al
5:25-cv-01199Nynd07.04.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE PRINELL PAUL Plaintiff(s) vs. CASE NUMBER: 5:25-cv-1199 (GTS/MJK) CARDEN, DOTZLER, HAMMOND LAW, PLLC LAW FIRM, CLIFFORD CARDEN, Attorney at Law; MATTHEW DOTZLER, Attorney at Law; DAVID HAMMOND, Attorney at Law; BRIAN TEDD, Attorney at Law; and NICHOLAS HURTADO, Attorney at Law Defendant(s) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Katz’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, dated April 7, 2026. DATED: April 7, 2026 s/ Abbigail Selnick Deputy Clerk Case 5:25-cv-01199-GTS-MJK Document 9 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.