Mazhar v. Nassau County Fire Marshals et al

1
U.S.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ MAZHAR,
Plaintiff,
– against –
NASSAU COUNTY FIRE MARSHALS,
MARK J.F SCHROEDER,
Defendants.
ORDER
25-cv-04787 (NCM) (JMW)
NATASHA C. MERLE, United States District Judge:
This Court has received the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated August
11, 2026, from the Honorable James M. Wicks, United States Magistrate Judge
recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule
41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 19. No objections have been filed.
The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has
been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Park v. Kim, No. 20-cv-02636,
2022 WL 3643966, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2022), aff’d, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024).
Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that
there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian,
Equifax, No. 17-cv-0371, 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate
of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y.
2011)).
Case 2:25-cv-04787-NCM-JMW Document 21 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and
Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). Accordingly, this action is dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment, close this case, and mail a
copy of this Order and the Judgment to the plaintiff at the address he provided to the
Court.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Natasha C. Merle
NATASHA C. MERLE
United States District Judge
Dated: 	October 1, 2026
Brooklyn, New York
Case 2:25-cv-04787-NCM-JMW Document 21 Filed 10/13/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>