1:25-mc-01560•James v. United States of America
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SEAN JAMES, Plaintiff, -against- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Case No. 1:25-mc-1560-FB Appearances: For the Plaintiff: SEAN JAMES, pro se 847 Americus Avenue. East Patchogue, NY 11772 For the Government: BLOCK, Senior District Judge: Sean James moves to expunge the record of his criminal conviction in United States v. James, 99-cr-219 (E.D.N.Y. 1999). Because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider such a motion, James’s motion is DISMISSED. In March 1999, James was indicted on one count of failing to file an accurate report when transporting more than $10,000 out of the country in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5316(a), and one count of lying to the United States Custom Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The result of these proceedings is sealed, but based on James’s current motion, they evidently resulted in a conviction. See Motion to Expunge, Dkt. 1. James now seeks to have that record expunged. He represents that he is attempting to pursue a career in the medical field and is trying to acquire a handgun license, but that his criminal record prevents him from doing so. The Court is well aware of the many unjust collateral consequences of a conviction. See United States v. Nesbeth, 188 F. Supp. 3d 179 (E.D.N.Y. 2016). Unfortunately, the Court is powerless to consider James’s motion. James seeks Case 1:25-mc-01560-FB Document 3 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 to have his record expunged on purely equitable grounds, but the Second Circuit has determined that, except in limited circumstances provided for by statute, district courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to expunge valid convictions. Doe v. United States, 833 F.3d 192, 196 (2d Cir. 2016). Because this case is indistinguishable from Doe, where the plaintiff similarly sought expungement due to the hardships imposed by the collateral consequences of her conviction, the Court must dismiss James’s motion. SO ORDERED. _/S/ Frederic Block___________ FREDERIC BLOCK Senior United States District Judge Brooklyn, New York February 19, 2026 Case 1:25-mc-01560-FB Document 3 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.