1:25-cv-05031•Stern & Stern, P.C. v. Cornelia
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x STERN & STERN, P.C., On Behalf of Municipal Credit Union, Plaintiff, -against- ANGELINE CORNELIA, Defendant. ------------------------------------x MEMORANDUM & ORDER 25-CV-5031 (EK)(RML) ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: On December 9, 2025, pro se defendant Angeline Cornelia filed a notice of removal purporting to remove a consumer debt collection action from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County to this Court. ECF No. 1. Cornelia’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, for the following reasons, this action is remanded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). First, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Cornelia alleges there is federal-question jurisdiction because her “Answer and Counterclaims include claims arising under the laws of the United States, specifically the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.” ECF No. 1, at 2. But “[u]nder the well-pleaded complaint rule, a defendant generally may not remove a case to federal court unless the plaintiff’s complaint establishes that the case arises under federal law.” McCulloch Orthopaedic Surgical Servs., PLLC v. Aetna Inc., 857 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 2017) Case 1:25-cv-05031-EK-RML Document 3 Filed 12/17/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 (emphasis added).1 And the complaint here does not raise any claim arising under federal law. Second, the removal is untimely. A notice of removal must be filed “within 30 days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1). Cornelia claims that she “was never served with a Summons and Complaint in this action” and “first became aware of this case when [she] received a notice from [the] court regarding a filing . . . .” ECF No. 1, at 20. Even assuming that is true, Cornelia was at least aware of this action by the time she filed her answer on September 4. Id. at 12-15. Therefore, her deadline to remove this action was October 6. This action is therefore remanded to the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County under Index Number CV-009306- 25/KI. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. /s/ Eric Komitee ERIC KOMITEE United States District Judge Dated: December 17, 2025 Brooklyn, New York 1 Unless otherwise noted, when quoting judicial decisions this order accepts all alterations and omits all citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks. Case 1:25-cv-05031-EK-RML Document 3 Filed 12/17/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.