Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
EMILIO LOPEZ MONDEJA,
Petitioner,
v. No. 2:26-cv-1075-KG-JHR
ATTORNEY GENERAL of the United States;
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
TODD LYONS, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
EL PASO FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
and WARDEN, Otero County Processing Center,
Respondents.1
ORDER TO ANSWER AND ENJOINING TRANSFER OUT OF DISTRICT
Before the Court is Petitioner’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) (Petition). Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
and requests, inter alia, that the Court order federal immigration officials to immediately release
him from custody pursuant to an Immigration Judge’s order granting his asylum petition. (Doc. 1)
at 4. Petitioner also asks the Court to enjoin his transfer from this district while his Petition is
pending. (Docs. 4 and 5).
Having conducted an initial review of the Petition, the Court finds the alleged facts raise a
colorable claim for relief. The Clerk’s Office has electronically served a copy of the petition in this
matter on all federal respondents by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management
and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. See (Doc. 6). The United States Attorney’s Office
1 The Court adds/substitutes the above-listed parties as Respondents in this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 (“On
motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party.”); Lowmaster v. Dir.,
Bureau of Prisons, 2024 WL 5135970, at *1 (D. Kan. Dec. 17, 2024) (“the Court notes that it routinely
substitutes the” proper parties as “respondent in habeas cases”); Danderson v. Page, 2024 WL 3913051, at
*2 (E.D. Okla. Aug. 20, 2024) (substituting the proper party respondent in a habeas case).
Case 2:26-cv-01075-KG-JHR Document 8 Filed 04/10/26 Page 1 of 2

2
(USAO) shall answer the Petition within ten (10) business days of entry of this Order and show
cause why the requested relief should not be granted. See Habeas Rules 1(b), 4 (courts have
discretion to set a time for respondents to answer a habeas petition). Petitioner may file an optional
reply within ten (10) business days after the answer brief is filed. The Court grants Petitioner’s
request to enjoin his transfer and enjoins the Government from transferring Petitioner from the
District of New Mexico while this case remains pending
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. The United States Attorney’s Office must answer the Petition within ten (10) business days
of entry of this Order and show cause why the requested relief should not be granted;
2. If Petitioner wishes to file an optional reply, he must do so within ten (10) business days
after Respondents’ response is filed;
3. Petitioner’s request to enjoin his transfer is granted and the Government is enjoined from
transferring Petitioner from the District of New Mexico while these proceedings remain
pending, absent express written authorization from this Court; and
4. The Clerk’s Office shall add the additional party Respondents set forth in the caption of this
Order to the docket of this case.
/s/Kenneth J. Gonzales___________________
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
• Please note that this document has been
electronically filed. To verify its authenticity,
please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the
NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing)
accompanying this document. Electronically
filed documents can be found on the Court’s
PACER public access system.
Case 2:26-cv-01075-KG-JHR Document 8 Filed 04/10/26 Page 2 of 2