Plua-Navas v. FCI Berlin, Warden

1:23-cv-00148Nhd30.01.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Rider R. Plua-Navas
v.
FCI Berlin, Warden
Case No. 23-cv-148-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone
dated December 29, 2023. For the reasons explained therein, the
Warden’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 6) is granted. Mr.
Plua-Navas’s is petition (Doc. No. 1) is dismissed moot.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
Date: January 30, 2024
cc: Rider R. Plua-Navas, pro se
Anna Dronzek, Esq.
Case 1:23-cv-00148-LM-AJ Document 9 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.