Baran et al v. NH Department of Corrections et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Paul Baran, et al
v.
New Hampshire Department
of Corrections, et al
Case No. 22-cv-44-01-SM
ORDER
No objections having been filed, I herewith approve the Report
and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated May
3, 2022, for the reasons set forth therein. The motion for class
certification (doc. no. 2) is denied. The plaintiffs are given thirty
days to file an amended complaint, signed by each pro se plaintiff who
wish to remain in the case or by retained counsel, failing which the
complaint (doc. no. 1) will be dismissed without prejudice. 	“‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union
No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271,
275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792
F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a
specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to
appeal).
So Ordered.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: May 25, 2022
cc: 	Paul Baran, pro se, et al
Case 1:22-cv-00044-SM-AJ Document 12 Filed 05/25/22 Page 1 of 1