Laifer et al v. Social Security Administration Employees et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Gail Anne Laifer and
Warren Laifer
v.
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration, and Manchester
Housing Authority
Case No. 19-cv-907-LM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated July 10, 2020, dismiss the Laifers’ complaint,
without prejudice, and direct that the clerk’s office enter
judgment and close this case. 	“‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
Chief Judge
cc: Gail Anne Laifer, pro se
Warren Laifer, pro se
Date: August 13, 2020
Case 1:19-cv-00907-LM Document 6 Filed 08/13/20 Page 1 of 1