1:18-cv-00670•Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lamont Paige v. Case No. 18-cv-670-SM FCI-Berlin Warden Robert Hazlewood, (former) FCI-Berlin Religious Services Assistant FNU Feliciano, and FCI-Berlin Chaplain FNU Thomas REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 40) seeking to dismiss Claims 4-6, as numbered by this court, regarding incidents occurring in 2019, as to which plaintiff had not exhausted his available Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) administrative remedies before adding those claims to this case, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. This court construed that motion as a motion for partial summary judgment as to Claims 4-6, see Feb. 24, 2020 Order (Doc. No. 41), and granted the parties an opportunity for additional briefing and discovery. Plaintiff, Lamont Paige, has objected to the motion for partial summary judgment. Doc. Nos. 47, 51. For reasons stated in defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 40) and in defendants’ supplemental filings (Doc. Nos. 46, 49), the motion for partial summary judgment is properly granted, insofar Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 55 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2 as plaintiff failed to exhaust the BOP remedies that were available to him, with respect to Claims 4-6, as required. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the district judge should grant the motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 40) with respect to Claims 4, 5, and 6, because of plaintiff’s failure to exhaust available BOP remedies before filing those claims, as required by the PLRA. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The fourteen-day period may be extended upon motion. Failure to file specific written objections to the Report and Recommendation within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court’s order. See Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016). ______________________________ Andrea K. Johnstone United States Magistrate Judge July 7, 2020 cc: Lamont Paige, pro se Michael T. McCormack, Esq. Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 55 Filed 07/07/20 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.