1:18-cv-00670•Paige et al v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lamont Paige, and Kevin Whitaker v. FCI-Berlin, Warden, Robert Hazlewood, and FNU Feliciano, Chaplain, FCI-Berlin Case No. 18-cv-670-SM ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated August 8, 2018, for the reasons set forth therein. Plaintiff Paige’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is hereby denied. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge Date: September 10, 2018 Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 2
cc: Lamont E. Paige, pro se Kevin Whitaker, pro se T. David Plourde, AUSA Case 1:18-cv-00670-SM Document 14 Filed 09/10/18 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.