Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

1:16-cv-00546Nhd28.03.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Stacey Mottram, et al
v.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 10, 2017. The plaintiffs’ request for a
preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly
those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Hon. Paul Barbadoro
United States District Court
Date: March 28, 2017
cc: Stacey Mottram, pro se
Darrin M. Mottram, pro se
Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq.
Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.