1:16-cv-00546•Mottram et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Stacey Mottram, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA Civil No. 16-cv-546-PB O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 10, 2017. The plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Hon. Paul Barbadoro United States District Court Date: March 28, 2017 cc: Stacey Mottram, pro se Darrin M. Mottram, pro se Joseph Patrick Kennedy, Esq. Case 1:16-cv-00546-PB Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.