Roosevelt v. Smith et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Theordore Roosevelt
v.
Janet Smith et al
Civil No. 16-cv-452-LM
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated March 21, 2017. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Landya B. McCafferty
United States District Judge
Date: May 16, 2017
Case 1:16-cv-00452-LM Document 35 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 2

cc: Jonathan A. Lax, Esq.
W. Kirk Abbott , Jr., Esq.
Rose Marie Joly, Esq.
Theodore Roosevelt, pro se
Case 1:16-cv-00452-LM Document 35 Filed 05/16/17 Page 2 of 2