Doiron v. Camirand et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Arthur Doiron
v.
FNU Camirand, et al.
Case No. 16-cv-264
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated May 12, 2017, for the reasons set forth therein.
Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw his motion to reopen this matter
is granted, without prejudice to plaintiff’s ability to file a
new motion to reopen this case at a later date.
“‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to
report are subject to review in the district court and those not
preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” 	School
Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human
Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United
States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after
proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to
magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
Case 1:16-cv-00264-SM Document 16 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 2

SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: June 7, 2017
cc: 	Arthur Doiron, pro se
Case 1:16-cv-00264-SM Document 16 Filed 06/07/17 Page 2 of 2