Uncensored AI, Inc. v. Venice AI, Inc. et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNCENSORED AI, INC., a Delaware
corporation;
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNCENSORED.COM, NOFILTERGPT,
INC., NASTIA CYBERNETICS, SAS,
VENICE AI, INC., FREEDOMGPT, INC.,
UNCENSOREDAI.IO, AP SOFTWARE,
LTD., HENRY FORDIN KATU 5, CLINT
NEILSON, CHAT UNCENSORED, INC.,
ERIC VORHEES, PERPLEXITY AI,
INC., and START ENGINE
CROWDFUNDING, INC.,
Defendants.
8:25CV40
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Pursuant to the court’s rules, a complaint must be served within 90 days of
filing the lawsuit. Plaintiff has not filed a return of service indicating service on the
following defendants and these defendants have not voluntarily appeared:
Uncensored.com
Nofiltergpt, Inc.
Nastia Cybernetics
SAS
Venice AI, Inc.
Freedom GPT, Inc.
Uncensoredai.io
8:25-cv-00040-JFB-JMD Doc # 78 Filed: 11/07/25 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

AP Software, Ltd.
Henry Fordin Katu 5
Clint Neilson
Chat Uncensored, Inc.
Eric Vorhees
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until November 21, 2025 to show
cause why his claims against these defendants should not be dismissed pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. The failure to
timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of these claims without further
notice.
Dated this 7th day of November, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cv-00040-JFB-JMD Doc # 78 Filed: 11/07/25 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>