USA v. Saucedo et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KILEAHA M. HANCOCK,
Defendant.
8:25CR189
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File
Pretrial Motions. (Filing No. 30). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause
shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Pretrial Motions, (Filing
No. 30), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions shall be filed by November 24, 2025.
3) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between October 26, 2025, and
November 24, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would
deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.
The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 27th day of October, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00189-BCB-MDN Doc # 31 Filed: 10/27/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>