3:23-cv-00813•Pfeffer v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:23-CV-813-KDB-DCK THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Defendants’ Motion To Stay Briefing On Plaintiffs’ Motion For Conditional Collective Certification And Facilitated Notice Or In The Alternative Extension Of Time To Respond” (Document No. 22) filed March 29, 2024. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion as moot. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Defendants’ Motion To Stay Briefing On Plaintiffs’ Motion For Conditional Collective Certification And Facilitated Notice Or In The Alternative Extension Of Time To Respond” (Document No. 22) is DENIED as moot. Judge Bell entered a “Case Management Order” (Document No. 23) setting deadlines for the case, including deadlines for briefing related to “Plaintiffs’ Motion For Conditional Collective Certification And Facilitated Notice” (Document No. 20). SO ORDERED. RUSSELL PFEFFER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, and BANK OF AMERICA N.A., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) Signed: April 8, 2024 Case 3:23-cv-00813-KDB-DCK Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.