Jackson v. Dejoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:22-CV-00021-MEO-DCK
ANDRE R. JACKSON JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID P. STEINER, in his official
capacity as POSTMASTER GENERAL,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed
September 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 53). By order filed December 18, 2025, pursuant to Roseboro v.
Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), Plaintiff was advised of the summary judgment procedure
and the possible consequences if he failed to respond adequately within 21 days of the Order. (Doc.
No. 55). On January 9, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the
summary judgment motion. The Court granted an extension and set the new response deadline for
January 23, 2026. Despite the extension, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendant’s motion
or otherwise responded to the Court’s Order.
The Court has analyzed the Motion for Summary Judgment and finds that for the reasons
set forth in Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant is entitled to a dismissal.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
(Doc. No. 53), is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety.
Signed February 9, 2026
Case 3:22-cv-00021-MEO-DCK Document 59 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1