8:08-ap-00080•Butler, III, Trustee v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al
Butler, III, Trustee v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al
8:08-ap-00080Nceb06.04.2011
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1285 In Re: JAMES A. ROSE, III, Debtor. ---------------------------------- ALGERNON LEE BUTLER, III, Trustee in Bankruptcy for James A. Rose, III, Trustee – Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS TRUSTEE; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, Defendants – Appellees, and WILLIAM WALT PETTIT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00145-FL; L-08-00080-8-AP) Submitted: February 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Case: 10-1285 Document: 45 Date Filed: 03/21/2011 Page: 1 Case 08-00080-8-JRL Doc 61 Filed 04/06/11 Entered 04/06/11 15:58:10 Page 1 of 3
2 Algernon L. Butler, III, BUTLER & BUTLER, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Alan B. Powell, Christopher C. Finan, ROBERSON, HAWORTH & REESE, P.L.L.C., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1285 Document: 45 Date Filed: 03/21/2011 Page: 2 Case 08-00080-8-JRL Doc 61 Filed 04/06/11 Entered 04/06/11 15:58:10 Page 2 of 3
3 PER CURIAM: Algernon L. Butler, III, as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of James A. Rose, III, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying the trustee’s motion seeking to invalidate — on the basis of a typographical error — the deed of trust currently held by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas on certain real property of the estate. The bankruptcy court and the district court held that a bona fide purchaser would have been on notice as to the error in the deed and, therefore, the trustee may not avoid the lien under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, the parties’ briefs, and all supplemental materials before the court and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated below. In re Rose (Butler v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.), Nos. 7:09-cv-00145-FL; L-08-00080-8-AP (E.D.N.C. July 20, 2009; Feb. 9, 2010). We deny the Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s order entered June 10, 2010, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Case: 10-1285 Document: 45 Date Filed: 03/21/2011 Page: 3 Case 08-00080-8-JRL Doc 61 Filed 04/06/11 Entered 04/06/11 15:58:10 Page 3 of 3
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.