8:06-ap-00075•Corbett v. Beneficial/Household Bank
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON DIVISION IN RE: ROSE LEE CORBETT, Debtor. Case No. 06-00508-8-JRL ROSE LEE CORBETT, Plaintiff, Adversary Proceeding No.: 06-00075-8-AP v. BENEFICIAL/HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER This case is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. On July 20, 2006, the court conducted a hearing in Wilmington, North Carolina. The plaintiff filed her Chapter 13 petition on February 22, 2006. The defendant was listed as a creditor on the plaintiff’s petition with an unsecured claim in the amount of $13,899.94. The plaintiff’s SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 07 day of August, 2006. ________________________________________ J. Rich Leonard United States Bankruptcy Judge ____________________________________________________________ Case 06-00075-8-JRL Doc 15 Filed 08/07/06 Entered 08/07/06 13:06:45 Page 1 of 3
2 mailing matrix also included the defendant so the court could notify it of the commencement of the bankruptcy case. On March 6, 2006, the defendant withdrew money from the plaintiff’s checking account in the amount of $232. The plaintiff testified that she subsequently contacted the defendant and requested that they stop all drafts because of her bankruptcy case. The defendant responded by asking her to prove it. As a result of the post-petition draft, the plaintiff was unable to make the monthly payment on her mobile home in a timely manner and was forced to pay a fee to First Citizens Bank to stop drafts on her account. On May 2, 2006, the plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that the defendant willfully violated the automatic stay. An answer was due on or before June 5, 2006. The defendant failed to answer and on June 26, 2006, default was entered against the defendant. No response was filed with regard to the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and no one appeared at the hearing on behalf of the defendant. Under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3), a stay is imposed upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, preventing creditors from taking any action “to obtain possession of property of the estate” or “to exercise control over property of the estate.” A debtor injured by the “willful violation of a stay” may recover actual damages and punitive damages. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(k). Based on the foregoing, the court finds that the defendant violated the automatic stay when it withdrew money from the plaintiff’s checking account post-petition. The defendant is directed to pay compensatory damages to the plaintiff in the amount of $292.55. The court also finds that the injury to the plaintiff was willful based on the defendant’s insistence that she prove her bankruptcy case after the court had already notified the defendant of the commencement of the case. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to Case 06-00075-8-JRL Doc 15 Filed 08/07/06 Entered 08/07/06 13:06:45 Page 2 of 3
3 punitive damages from the defendant in the amount of $500. The court also directs the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees in the amount of $750. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion is granted pursuant to Rule 7055 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. “End of Document” Case 06-00075-8-JRL Doc 15 Filed 08/07/06 Entered 08/07/06 13:06:45 Page 3 of 3
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.