6:25-cr-03076•USA v. Platek
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID WILLIAM PLATEK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 6:25-cr-03076-RK-1 ORDER On January 28, 2026, Chief Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. issued his Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 106), concluding that the Court should deny Defendant David W. Platek’s motion to suppress evidence, (Doc. 63). Defendant Platek filed objections. (Doc. 120). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(b)(3), a “district judge must consider de novo any objection to a magistrate judge’s recommendation.” After an independent, de novo review of the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including a review of the applicable law and Defendant’s objections, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations made by Chief Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. in full. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that: (1) the Report and Recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr., (Doc. 106), is ADOPTED; (2) Defendant’s objections, (Doc. 120), are OVERRULED; and (3) Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, (Doc. 63), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Roseann A. Ketchmark ROSEANN A. KETCHMARK, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATED: February 18, 2026 Case 6:25-cr-03076-MBB Document 128 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.