Yarbrough v. City of Webb City et al

3:25-cv-05069Mowd13.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
BENJAMIN MICHAEL YARBROUGH, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. 3:25-cv-5069-MDH
)
)
JEANNE BROCKMAN, Records Officer 	)
CHIEF DON MELTON, Police Chief 	)
OFFICER TYLER WINTERS, 	)
Transporting Officer 	)
OFFICER ADAM MORRIS (#427), 	)
Arresting Officer 	)
OFFICER WATTS, Transporting Officer 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is a Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. 41). Plaintiff asks for
reconsideration of this Court’s remand order entered on March 26, 2026. (Doc. 40). In that order
the Court found that removal from municipal court was improper, and it lacks subject matter
jurisdiction over this case.
In the present motion, Plaintiff presents a ‘Chronological Timeline of Violations’ and
damages calculations. These facts are the same facts presented in the filings previously considered
by this Court. Plaintiff does not present any new information. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion fails to
cure the subject matter defect described in its remand Order. (Doc. 40).
For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Case 3:25-cv-05069-MDH Document 50 Filed 05/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2
Date: May 13, 2026
/s/ Douglas Harpool_____________
DOUGLAS HARPOOL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-05069-MDH Document 50 Filed 05/13/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.