3:25-cv-05069•Yarbrough v. City of Webb City et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION BENJAMIN MICHAEL YARBROUGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:25-cv-5069-MDH ) ) JEANNE BROCKMAN, Records Officer ) CHIEF DON MELTON, Police Chief ) OFFICER TYLER WINTERS, ) Transporting Officer ) OFFICER ADAM MORRIS (#427), ) Arresting Officer ) OFFICER WATTS, Transporting Officer ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is a Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. 41). Plaintiff asks for reconsideration of this Court’s remand order entered on March 26, 2026. (Doc. 40). In that order the Court found that removal from municipal court was improper, and it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. In the present motion, Plaintiff presents a ‘Chronological Timeline of Violations’ and damages calculations. These facts are the same facts presented in the filings previously considered by this Court. Plaintiff does not present any new information. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion fails to cure the subject matter defect described in its remand Order. (Doc. 40). For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case 3:25-cv-05069-MDH Document 50 Filed 05/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Date: May 13, 2026 /s/ Douglas Harpool_____________ DOUGLAS HARPOOL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-05069-MDH Document 50 Filed 05/13/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.