4:25-cv-00690•Edwards v. Fruits et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTIAN EDWARDS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v ) No. 4:25-cv-00690-MTS ) DAVID FRUITS and ST. CHARLES ) POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Christian Edwards’s latest Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Doc. [20]. Upon review of it and Plaintiff’s Certified inmate account statement, the Court will grant the Motion and assess an initial partial filing fee of twelve dollars and sixty-nine cents ($12.69). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 716 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (explaining that prisoner-litigants must “pay filing fees in full, with the only issue being whether the inmate pays the entire filing fee at the initiation of the proceeding or in installments over a period of time”). Plaintiff must pay his initial partial filing fee to the Court no later than Friday, March 27, 2026. The failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. [20], is GRANTED. Case: 4:25-cv-00690-MTS Doc. #: 22 Filed: 02/10/26 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of twelve dollars and sixty-nine cents ($12.69) no later than Friday, March 27, 2026. Plaintiff shall make his remittance payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s other Motions regarding proceeding without prepaying fees, Docs. [12], [15], & [16], are DENIED as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions to Appoint Counsel, Docs. [14], [17], and [18], are DENIED without prejudice for the reasons previously noted by the Court. See Doc. [11]. Dated this 10th day of February 2026. MATTHEW T. SCHELP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 4:25-cv-00690-MTS Doc. #: 22 Filed: 02/10/26 Page: 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.