4:24-cr-00532•USA v. White
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:24-CR-532 HEA ) IRVEN WHITE, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Irven White’s objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. (ECF No. 59). The objections were originally filed out of time by Defendant White without the assistance of counsel. On October 16, 2025, Defendant White’s newly appointed counsel filed a motion requesting the Court to consider Defendant White’s untimely objections, which the Court granted. (ECF Nos. 68 and 86). In his August 4, 2025 Report and Recommendation, Judge Bodenhausen recommends that Defendant’s Omnibus Motion to Dismiss the Indictment, as supplemented, be denied. (ECF Nos. 38 and 51). When a party objects to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court must conduct a de novo review of the portions of the report, findings, or recommendations to which the party objects. See United States v. Lothridge, 324 F.3d 599, 600 (8th Cir. 2003) Case: 4:24-cr-00532-HEA Doc. #: 87 Filed: 10/27/25 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). The Court has reviewed the record and independently considered Defendant White’s objections and has determined that the objections are without merit. The Court is in full agreement with the stated rationale of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations and will adopt the same. After de novo review, this Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Irven White’s Objections are OVERRULED. [ECF No. 59] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. [ECF No. 56] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Irven White’s Motion to Dismiss, as supplemented, is DENIED. [ECF Nos. 38 & 51] Dated this 27 th day of October, 2025. ________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 4:24-cr-00532-HEA Doc. #: 87 Filed: 10/27/25 Page: 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.