Boateng v. Maurstad et al

0:26-cv-01634Mnd01.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ERIC OSEI BOATENG,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEIGH MAURSTAD and CARVER
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants.
Case No. 26-cv-1634 (LMP/DTS)
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the Court on the April 2, 2026 Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) 	of 	United 	States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	David T. 	Schultz 	which 	recommends
dismissing this action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See ECF No. 4.
No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R
for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full.
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1. 	The R&R (ECF No. 4) is ADOPTED IN FULL; and
CASE 0:26-cv-01634-LMP-DTS Doc. 5 Filed 05/01/26 Page 1 of 2
2
2. 	The complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 1, 2026 	s/Laura M. Provinzino
Laura M. Provinzino
United States District Judge
CASE 0:26-cv-01634-LMP-DTS Doc. 5 Filed 05/01/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.