0:26-cv-01259•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA YOLANDA ELVIRA GARZA ZACARIAS, Petitioner, vs. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, et al., Respondents. 0:26-CV-1259 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS The petitioner is a noncitizen currently detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. She contends his detention is unlawful because she was denied a bond hearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1) and 1236.1(d)(1). See filing 1. The government responds that detention is mandatory, not discretionary, and the petitioner is not eligible to be released. See filing 5. The briefing demonstrates that the petitioner's application for the writ only presents issue of law—and the government does not dispute this point, having been directed to address it, see filing 3 at 2; filing 5—so the Court declines to hold a hearing. See § 2243. The Court will conditionally grant the petition for the reasons thoroughly articulated by the undersigned in Velasco Hurtado v. Bondi, No. 0:26-CV-546, 2026 WL 184884 (D. Minn. Jan. 24, 2026).1 1 A petitioner seeking release from immigration detention shall be awarded costs and reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), unless the Court finds that the government's position was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. See Michelin v. Warden Moshannon Valley Corr. Ctr., No. 24-2990, 2026 WL 263483 (3d Cir. Feb. 2, 2026); see also, e.g., Yeferson G.C. v. Easterwood, No. 25-CV-4814, 2026 WL 207266, at *3 (D. Minn. Jan. 21), report and CASE 0:26-cv-01259-JMG-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 02/10/26 Page 1 of 2
2 IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) is conditionally granted. 2. The government shall provide the petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and the corresponding regulations on or before February 17, 2026. 3. If the government does not provide the petitioner with a bond hearing as required, the petitioner must be immediately released from detention. 4. On or before February 19, 2026, the government shall provide the Court with a status update regarding the bond hearing or, if no bond hearing was held, advise the Court regarding the petitioner's release. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 10th day of February, 2026. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard Senior United States District Judge recommendation adopted, 2026 WL 209825 (D. Minn. Jan. 27, 2026); Mairena-Munguia v. Arnott, No. 25-CV-3318, 2025 WL 3229132, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 19, 2025); cf. Bah v. Cangemi, 548 F.3d 680 (8th Cir. 2008) (evaluating the merits of immigration habeas petitioner's EAJA claim). Any motion for costs and fees pursuant to the EAJA in this case should be filed within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See § 2412(d)(1)(B). CASE 0:26-cv-01259-JMG-ECW Doc. 6 Filed 02/10/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.