Jones v. Vaught

0:25-cv-04488Mnd24.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jeremy D. Jones, FCI Sandstone, P.O. Box 1000., Sandstone, MN 55072, pro
se plaintiff;
Ana H. Voss, Justin Merak Page, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 300
South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for Defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
John F. Docherty dated February 6, 2026 (Docket No. [5]), along with all the files and
records, and because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	The petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Jeremy D.
Jones (Docket No. [1]) be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
2. 	The matter be DISMISSED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
JEREMY D. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
T. VAUGHT,
Warden – FCI Sandstone,
Defendant.
Civil No. 25-4488 (JRT/JFD)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
CASE 0:25-cv-04488-JRT-JFD Doc. 7 Filed 03/24/26 Page 1 of 2
-2-
DATED: March 24, 2026 	_____/s/ John R. Tunheim_____
at Minneapolis, Minnesota. 	JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
CASE 0:25-cv-04488-JRT-JFD Doc. 7 Filed 03/24/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.