0:25-cv-03555•Lockhart v. St. Louis Park Police Department et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CHARLES CALVIN LOCKHART, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE ALLISON JONES, JOHN DOE 1, and JOHN DOE 2, Defendants. Case No. 25‐CV‐3555 (NEB/DTS) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has received the November 20, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (ECF No. 12.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above‐ captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is ACCEPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Rule 34(a) Request for Production of Documents and Video (ECF No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT. CASE 0:25-cv-03555-NEB-DTS Doc. 13 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 8, 2026 BY THE COURT: s/Nancy E. Brasel Nancy E. Brasel United States District Judge CASE 0:25-cv-03555-NEB-DTS Doc. 13 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.