0:25-cv-03538•Hemphill v. 3M Company et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS) WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS ORDER LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: 1. Case No. 25-cv-3538 (Estate of Hemphill v. 3M Company et al) 2. Case No. 25-cv-3669 (Bright v. 3M Company et al) 3. Case No. 25-cv-3670 (Combs v. 3M Company et al) 4. Case No. 25-cv-3673 (Flanagan v. 3M Company et al) In an Amended Report and Recommendation dated February 27, 2026, the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the four actions listed above be dismissed with prejudice. No objection has been filed. Based on a de novo review of the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 3349] except as modified with respect to Case No. 25-cv-3538. In Case No. 25-cv-3538, the complaint identifies Linda Hemphill as the plaintiff. Hemphill apparently died before the action’s commencement. An amended complaint, which identifies her estate as the plaintiff but provides no information about the representative of the estate, was filed the day after the action’s commencement. The Court dismisses the action without prejudice. See Harris v. US Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 20- 2005, 2021 WL 7542603, at *3 (6th Cir. Sept. 10, 2021); LN Mgmt., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 957 F.3d 943, 953 (9th Cir. 2020); House v. Mitra QSR KNE LLC, 796 F. App’x 783, 791 (4th Cir. 2019); Hernandez v. Smith, 793 F. App’x 261, 265–66 (5th Cir. 2019) (per curiam); Est. of Baker v. NewRez, LLC, No. 24-CV-02934, 2025 WL CASE 0:25-cv-03538-JNE-DTS Doc. 9 Filed 04/21/26 Page 1 of 2
2 1348933, at *2 (W.D. Tenn. May 8, 2025) (“Under Tennessee law, an estate by itself is not a proper party.”). Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Case No. 25-cv-3538 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Case No. 25-cv-3538. 2. Case No. 25-cv-3669, Case No. 25-cv-3670, and Case No. 25-cv-3673 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In each action, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment. Dated: April 21, 2026 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge CASE 0:25-cv-03538-JNE-DTS Doc. 9 Filed 04/21/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.