Larry v. Vaught

0:25-cv-02934Mnd04.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Orlando Larry, 230 W Sunny Lane Road, Janesville, WI 53546, pro se
Petitioner.
Ana H. Voss, Trevor Brown, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 300 South
4 th Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for Defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
Dulce J. Foster dated September 2, 2025 (Docket No. [7]), along with all the files and
records, and because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
2. 	Petitioner 	Orlando 	Larry’s 	application 	to 	proceed 	in 	forma
pauperis in this matter (ECF No. 4) be DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
ORLANDO LARRY,
Petitioner,
v.
T. VAUGHT, Warden.
Defendant.
Civil No. 25-2934 (JRT/DJF)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
CASE 0:25-cv-02934-JRT-DJF Doc. 8 Filed 02/04/26 Page 1 of 2
-2-
DATED: February, 4, 2026 	_____/s/ John R. Tunheim_____
at Minneapolis, Minnesota. 	JOHN R. TUNHEIM
United States District Judge
CASE 0:25-cv-02934-JRT-DJF Doc. 8 Filed 02/04/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.