0:21-cr-00101•USA v. Wilson
Gesamter Gesetzestext
CASE 0:21-cr-00101-JRT-DTS Doc. 149 Filed 05/07/26 Page 1 of 1
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
CASE 0:21-cr-00101-JRT-DTS Doc. 149 Filed 05/07/26 Page 1 of 1 AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Minnesota United States of America V. Jeremy Wade Wilson Case No: CR21-101(1) JRT/DTS USM No: 42426-509 Date of Original Judgment: 02/03/2025 Date of Previous Amended Judgment: (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) - Robert A. Lengeling Defendant's Attorney ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in months is reduced to the last judgment issued) of (See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted) The Amendment is not applicable to the Defendant, pursuant to USSG §1B1.10(a)(2)(A). The defendant does not qualify as a zero-point offender, and he did not incur any status points. Moreover, the Court applied a downward variance at sentencing below the low-end of the advisory range. Therefore, the defendant is ineligible for a sentencing reduction. ACCORDINGLY, the Pro Se Motion to Reduce Sentence -USSC Amendment 821 filed by Jeremy Wade Wilson (Doc. No. 145) is DENIED. Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 02/03/2025 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Order Date: 05/07/2026 /s/ John R. Tunheim Judge's signature Effective Date: John R. Tunheim, United States District Court Judge (if different from order date) Printed name and title AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO AMA
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.