0:16-cv-00384•Roth v. 3M Company et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR MDL No. 15-2666 (JNE/DTS) WARMING DEVICES PRODUCTS ORDER LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Case No. 16-cv-384 (Naomi Roth v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) Case No. 16-cv-545 (Brenda Sanchez, on behalf of the Estate of Robert Andras, Sr. v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) Case No. 16-cv-3242 (Wanda Lantz v. 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.) In a Report and Recommendation dated January 23, 2026, the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv- 545, and 16-cv-3242 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objection has been filed. Based on a de novo review of the record, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 20 in Case No. 16-cv- 384; Docket No. 21 in Case No. 16-cv-545; Docket No. 12 in Case No. 16-cv-3242]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Case Nos. 16-cv-384, 16-cv-545, and 16-cv-3242 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: April 10, 2026 s/Joan N. Ericksen JOAN N. ERICKSEN United States District Judge CASE 0:16-cv-00384-JNE-DTS Doc. 21 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.