2:25-cv-00203•Burnett #200640 v. Washington et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION M ICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT, #200640, ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 2:25-cv-203 -v- ) ) Honorable Paul L. Maloney BRENDA BUCHANAN , et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Michael Burnett, a prisoner under the control of the Michigan Department of Corrections, alleges Defendants violated his civil rights. Plaintiff proceeds without the assistance of counsel. Defendant Buchanan filed a motion for summary judgment raising the failure to exhaust as a defense (ECF no. 15). The Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending the court grant Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 35). Plaintiff filed objections (ECF No. 42). After being served with a report and recommendation (R&R) issued by a magistrate judge, a party has fourteen days to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A district court judge reviews de novo the portions of the R&R to which objections have been filed. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Only those objections that are specific are entitled to a de novo review under the statute. Mira v. Marshall, 806 F.2d 636, 637 (6th Cir. 1986) (per curiam). Case 2:25-cv-00203-PLM-PJG ECF No. 44, PageID.<pageID> Filed 04/14/26 Page 1 of 2
2 The court finds that Plaintiff’s objections do not establish any error in the Magistrate Judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law. MDOC identified a proper reason for rejecting Plaintiff’s grievance. The Magistrate Judge set forth the relevant provisions and deadlines in the Policy Directive concerning Grievances and concludes Plaintiff did not properly exhaust his grievance against Defendant Buchanan. Plaintiff has not established that the requirements in the Policy Directive for Grievances do not apply to disputes about health care services. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the report and recommendation (ECF No. 35) and GRANTS Defendant Buchanan’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 14, 2026 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge Case 2:25-cv-00203-PLM-PJG ECF No. 44, PageID.<pageID> Filed 04/14/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.