2:24-cv-00183•Caffey #742995 v. Schroeder et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION BRANDO CAFFEY, Plaintiff, v. SARAH SCHROEDER, et al., Defendants. _________________________/ Case No. 2:24-cv-183 HON. JANE M. BECKERING ORDER This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Racine filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26). Defendants Perry and Greenwald filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30) on May 8, 2026, recommending that this Court grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss this case. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the remaining parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 26 & 27) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any Case 2:24-cv-00183-JMB-MV ECF No. 31, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/17/26 Page 1 of 2
2 objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order. Dated: June 17, 2026 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge Case 2:24-cv-00183-JMB-MV ECF No. 31, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/17/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.