Caffey #742995 v. Schroeder et al

2:24-cv-00183Miwd17.06.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANDO CAFFEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SARAH SCHROEDER, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________/
Case No. 2:24-cv-183
HON. JANE M. BECKERING
ORDER
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant
Racine filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 26). Defendants Perry and Greenwald
filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27). The matter was referred to the Magistrate
Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30) on May 8, 2026, recommending
that this Court grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss this case. The Report and Recommendation
was duly served on the remaining parties. 	No objections have been filed. 	See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 26 &
27) are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)
that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any
Case 2:24-cv-00183-JMB-MV ECF No. 31, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/17/26 Page 1
of 2
2
objections. 	See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on
other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: June 17, 2026 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
JANE M. BECKERING
United States District Judge
Case 2:24-cv-00183-JMB-MV ECF No. 31, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/17/26 Page 2
of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.