USA v. Ballard et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 1:26-cr-16-04
v. 	Hon. Paul L. Maloney
DEMYRON LASHUN ROBINSON,
Defendant.
/
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to W.D. Mich. LCrR 11.1 and upon a request of the district court, I
conducted a felony plea hearing in this matter on June 11, 2026, after receiving the written consent
of the defendant, the defendant's attorney, and the attorney for the government. These consents
were also placed on the record in open court.
Defendant Demyron Lashun Robinson is charged in Count 5 of a multi-count
Indictment with distribution of cocaine. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I found
that defendant was competent to enter a plea of guilty and that the plea was knowing and voluntary
with a full understanding of each of the rights waived by the defendant, that the defendant fully
understood the nature of the charge and the consequences of the plea, and that the defendant's plea
had a sufficient basis in fact which contained all of the elements of the offense charged.
I inquired into the plea agreement. 	I found the plea agreement to have been
knowingly and voluntarily made and found that it fully reflected all of the promises made by the
parties.
Accordingly, I accepted the plea of guilty, subject to final acceptance of the plea by
Case 1:26-cr-00016-PLM ECF No. 90, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/11/26 Page 1 of 2

the District Judge, and I specifically reserved acceptance of the plea agreement for the District
Judge. I ordered the preparation of a presentence investigation report.
Recommendation
Based upon the foregoing, I respectfully recommend that the defendant's plea of
guilty to Count 5 of the Indictment be accepted, that the Court adjudicate the defendant guilty of
that charge, and that the written plea agreement be accepted at, or before, the time of sentencing.
Dated: June 11, 2026 	/s/ Ray Kent
RAY KENT
United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO PARTIES
You have the right to de novo review by the district judge of the foregoing findings.
Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or
proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than fourteen (l4) days after the plea
hearing. See W.D. Mich. LCrR 11.1(b). A failure to file timely objections may result in the waiver
of any further right to seek appellate review of the plea-taking procedure. See Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140 (1985); Neuman v. Rivers, 125 F.3d 315, 322-23 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1030
(1997); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
Case 1:26-cr-00016-PLM ECF No. 90, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/11/26 Page 2 of 2