1:25-cv-00757•Blaylock #895020 v. Burgess et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES BLAYLOCK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BURGESS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ Case No. 1:25-cv-757 Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou ORDER On April 24, 2026, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) that the Court deny Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary judgment. (R&R, ECF No. 22.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Boerema’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 15) is DENIED. Dated: May 11, 2026 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 1:25-cv-00757-HYJ-MV ECF No. 23, PageID.<pageID> Filed 05/11/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.