Tubbs #292944 v. Wakefield et al

1:24-cv-01292Miwd01.12.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANYALE SHARRON TUBBS,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNKNOWN WAKEFIELD, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________/
Case No. 1:24-cv-1292
HON. JANE M. BECKERING
ORDER
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants
Wakefield and Jacoutot filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed
to exhaust his administrative remedies (ECF No. 16). The matter was referred to the Magistrate
Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) on October 24, 2025,
recommending that this Court deny the motion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served
on the remaining parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is
DENIED.
The case proceeds as to Plaintiff’s excessive force claims against Defendants Wakefield
and Jacoutot relating to the use of the restraint chair on September 26, 2022.
Dated: December 1, 2025 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
JANE M. BECKERING
United States District Judge
Case 1:24-cv-01292-JMB-MV ECF No. 28, PageID.<pageID> Filed 12/01/25 Page 1
of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.