1:24-cv-01129•Clark #222915 v. Nessel et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AARON CLARK, Plaintiff, v. DANA NESSEL, et al., Defendants. ________________________/ Case No. 1:24-cv-1129 HON. JANE M. BECKERING ORDER This is a civil action brought by a pro se litigant. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) on December 29, 2025, recommending that this Court grant the motion and dismiss this lawsuit. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED and this lawsuit is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). Case 1:24-cv-01129-JMB-RSK ECF No. 15, PageID.<pageID> Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 2
2 A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order. Dated: February 3, 2026 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge Case 1:24-cv-01129-JMB-RSK ECF No. 15, PageID.<pageID> Filed 02/03/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.