5:25-cv-11246•Nelson v. Highland Park, City of et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Robert F. Nelson, Jr., Plaintiff, v. City of Highland Park, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ Case No. 25-11246 Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Mag. Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART [26] AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr.’s Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss the complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and to deny as moot Defendants Adriene Brinkley, Officer Butler, John Doe, City of Highland Park, and James McMahan’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning. However, Case 5:25-cv-11246-JEL-CI ECF No. 27, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/22/25 Page 1 of 2
the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice, not with prejudice. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 26) is ADOPTED IN PART, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT (ECF No. 22), and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2025 s/Judith E. Levy Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or first-class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on October 22, 2025. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager 1 By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019). Case 5:25-cv-11246-JEL-CI ECF No. 27, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/22/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.