Bostic v. Wyandotte County Police Department

5:25-cv-03056Ksd15.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DAJHON AMARIA BOSTIC,
Plaintiff,
v. CASE NO. 25-3056-JWL
WYANDOTTE COUNTY
POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff brings this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is currently
in the custody of the Missouri Department of Corrections. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. (See Doc. 8.) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motions to
amend the complaint (Docs. 25, 27) and motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 26).
Plaintiff asks the Court to amend his Complaint to remove the Wyandotte County Police
Department as a defendant and to substitute named defendants for the two John Doe defendants
named in the Complaint. (Doc. 25, at 1-2). Plaintiff also seeks to add facts and arguments to the
Complaint. Id. at 2-7.
Plaintiff’s motions to amend are denied. To add claims, significant factual allegations, or
change defendants, a plaintiff must submit a complete amended complaint rather than merely
supplement an existing complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. An amended complaint is not simply
an addendum to the original complaint, and instead completely supersedes it. Therefore, any
claims or allegations not included in the amended complaint are no longer before the Court. It
follows that a plaintiff may not simply refer to an earlier pleading, and the amended complaint
Case 5:25-cv-03056-JWB-RES Document 29 Filed 01/15/26 Page 1 of 4
2
must contain all allegations and claims that a plaintiff intends to pursue in the action, including
those to be retained from the original complaint.
Because Plaintiff needs to file a complete amended complaint rather than merely
supplement the original Complaint, the Court denies the motion. The Court will grant Plaintiff an
opportunity to submit an amended complaint on the court-approved form that sets forth all of his
claims and defendants.
Plaintiff must write the number of this case (25-3056-JWL) at the top of the first page of
the amended complaint and must name every defendant in the caption of the amended complaint.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Plaintiff should also refer to each defendant again in the body of the
amended complaint, where Plaintiff must allege facts describing the unconstitutional acts taken by
each defendant including dates, locations, and circumstances. Plaintiff must allege sufficient
additional facts to show a federal constitutional violation. Plaintiff is given time to file a complete
and proper amended complaint in which Plaintiff (1) raises only properly joined claims and
defendants; (2) alleges sufficient facts to state a claim for a federal constitutional violation and
show a cause of action in federal court; and (3) alleges sufficient facts to show personal
participation by each named defendant.
Plaintiff also filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel (Doc. 26).
Plaintiff argues that being incarcerated severely limits his ability to obtain legal counsel and that
he does not have the education necessary to pursue his case. (Doc. 26, at 2.)
The Court has considered Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. There is no
constitutional right to appointment of counsel in a civil case. Carper v. DeLand, 54 F.3d 613, 616
(10th Cir. 1995). “Rather, a court has discretion to request an attorney to represent a litigant who
is proceeding in forma pauperis” in a civil case. Johnson v. Johnson, 466 F.3d 1213, 1217 (10th
Case 5:25-cv-03056-JWB-RES Document 29 Filed 01/15/26 Page 2 of 4
3
Cir. 2006) (emphasis added) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)). In other words, if this motion is
granted, it means only that the Court will request that an attorney volunteer to be appointed to
represent Plaintiff at no cost to Plaintiff. The Court cannot guarantee that an attorney will
volunteer. See Rachel v. Troutt, 820 F.3d 390, 396 (10th Cir. 2016) (“Courts are not authorized to
appoint counsel in § 1983 cases; instead, courts can only ‘request’ an attorney to take a case.”).
The decision whether to appoint counsel — meaning to request counsel to provide
representation at no cost to Plaintiff — in a civil matter lies in the discretion of the district court.
Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991). The burden is on the applicant to convince
the court that there is sufficient merit to his claim to warrant appointment of counsel. Steffey v.
Orman, 461 F.3d 1218, 1223 (10th Cir. 2006) (citing Hill v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 393 F.3d
1111, 1115 (10th Cir. 2004)). It is not enough “that having counsel appointed would have assisted
[the prisoner] in presenting his strongest possible case, [as] the same could be said in any case.”
Steffey, 461 F.3d at 1223 (citing Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995)).
In deciding whether to request volunteer counsel for Plaintiff, the Court has considered
“the merits of the prisoner’s claims, the nature and complexity of the factual and legal issues, and
the prisoner’s ability to investigate the facts and present his claims.” Rucks, 57 F.3d at 979; Hill,
393 F.3d at 1115. The Court concludes in this case that (1) it is not clear at this juncture that
Plaintiff has asserted a colorable claim against a named defendant; (2) the issues are not complex;
and (3) Plaintiff appears capable of adequately presenting facts and arguments. The Court denies
the motion without prejudice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff’s motions to amend
(Docs. 25, 27) are denied.
Case 5:25-cv-03056-JWB-RES Document 29 Filed 01/15/26 Page 3 of 4
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.
26) is denied without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until February 17, 2026, in which
to file a complete and proper amended complaint on the Court-approved form.
The Clerk is directed to send § 1983 forms and instructions to Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated January 15, 2026, in Kansas City, Kansas.
S/ John W. Lungstrum
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-03056-JWB-RES Document 29 Filed 01/15/26 Page 4 of 4

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.