1:81-F-00490•IN RE: Texaco Credit Card Processing Charge Litigation
IN RE: Texaco Credit Card Processing Charge Litigation
1:81-F-00490Jpml19.05.2015
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Ca 0 se MDL No. 490 Document 2 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 2 SEL Fe RE ISper mya il eld : So EN IT pa. Lo Foo SL RICT TESA 3FILE2 . MAR -3 987 i - Co PATRI 0 oe " i) 7 ! Ta RA I ER I ! DOCKET NO. 490 CLERK GF The pon Gr Creda ~ re BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION SR IN RE TEXACO CREDIT CARD PROCESSING CHARGE LITIGATION Co : ORDER DENYING TRANSFER* CL Co Presently before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to CL28 U.S.C. §1407, brought by Texaco Inc. (Texaco), defendant . ooin the seven actions listed on the attached Schedule A, : to centralize those actions in a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. on the basis of the record before us, we find that Section 1407 transfer at the present time would neither ~ Co serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses nor further Lo - o the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. We note that, in the Pennsylvania action, judgment for defendant : :Texaco has been entered after trial on the merits. Our decision is made without prejudice to the right no of any party to move for transfer under Section 1407 at : - a later date if it pelieves future circumstances So require. Pl IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer oo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 be, and the same hereby is,DENIED. . FOR THE PANEL: : Co Charles R. Weiner Ek : or : Acting Chairman — * Judges Andrew A. caffrey and Fred Daugherty recused oo themselves and took no part in the decision of this matter. To Judges Roy W. Harper and Sam C. Pointer, Jr. were unable :to attend the hearing in this matter but have, with the consent of all parties, participated in this decision.
Case MDL No. 490 Document 2 Filed 05/19/15 Page 2 of 2 p Schedule A PY MDL-490 -- In re Texaco Credit Card Processing Charge Litigation District of the District of Columbia Bird Oil Co., Inc., et al. v. Texaco Inc., . C.A. No. 81-2519 Western District of Tennessee Thomas H. Cain, d/b/a Cain's Texaco v. Texaco Inc., : C.A. No. 81-2852-M Southern District of Indiana Darryl L. Glaser, d/b/a Glaser's Texaco, etc. v. Texaco Inc., C.A. No. EV-81-220-C District of Maryland Greater Washington/Maryland Service Station Association, Inc., et al. v. Texaco Inc., C.A. No. R-81-2590 District of Nevada Jay S. Kennedy, etc. Vv. Texaco Inc., C.A. No. LV-81-701-RDF ) Eastern District of Pennsylvania William Melso, et al v. Texaco Inc., . C.A. No. 81-4209 Southern District of Florida Smitty's Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Smitty's Texaco Service, et al. v. Texaco, Inc., C.A. No. 81-8389-Civ~-NCR
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.