IN RE: Federal Trade Commission Statistical Reporting Programs Litigation

To Case MDL No. 254 Document2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1of	5...
| EEE .. DOCKET NO. 254 Cd ol
| SE SE HUL VEST ARAL =	a : r= LS id 30,8RCH :
LL BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIONLZr	ioh
® ) IN RE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION STATISTICAL REPORTING ProGizilS 8 srs
i : i ANSE B
: ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION So . -
VACATING HEARING ORDER ’ oo
oo On April 20, 1976, 86 of the 88 plaintiffs in the a
actions pending in the District of Delaware filed a motion and
supporting memorandum to transfer related actions to that
district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings
- under 28 U.S.C. §1407. On May 24, 1976, this matter was scheduled
Cd for hearing before the Panel on June 25, 1976.
oo By orders filed April 30, 1976, May 14, 1976, and SE
May 25, 1976, Judges Murray M. Schwartz and Edward Weinfeld trans-
ferred all related actions from the District of Delaware and the :
Southern District of New York to the United States District Court =
for the District of Columbia. Inasmuch as these actions were :
transferred under 28 U.S.C. §l404(a), the guestion of Section 1407
treatment is moot and on May 28, 1976, the movants filed a with- .
® yo drawal of their motion. oo oo EEAo : SR
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the hearing order filed :
1 . on May 24, 1976, and the Schedule A attached thereto be, and the :
| same hereby are, VACATED insofar as they relate to the above~ EE
captioned litigation. Co EEE
FOR THE PANEL: ~~. HN
i | WE Fen ERAS ASSAD EE
: : John Minor Wisdom
: Co : : Chairman IEEE

| A, "Case MDL No. 254 Document?2 Filed05/01/15 Page	2 of 5 Co LRPo oT : Lo | Cs
co | MDL-254 -- IN RE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION STATISTICAL REPORTING	20%Cl TT PROGRAMS LITIGATION §]
| ~ DISTRICT OF DELAWARE = So
A. O. Smith Corp., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, SE. ’ Z E T. C. i *4 . 75-15 . ~ }
oo et at., C.A. No (J. Schwartz) :
nN Inland Steel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al.
oo Northwest Industries), Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission,
oo Oscar Mayer & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, | :
et al., C.A. No. 75-47 : .
. Merck & Co., Inc.	v. Federal Trade Commission, et al.
~~ T.A. No.75-48 TT oT
Co Hobart Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. EA
: C.A. No. 75-49 - ) CoE
j The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal Trade "L
Commission, et al., C.A. No, 75-50 oo @bi . TT - 0
C : Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, =. -.et al., C.A, No. 75-56
| oo American Air Filter Co., Inc., et al. v. Federal ~ a
Trade Commission, et al., C.A, No. 75-412 EE
| Allen-Bradley Co., et al, v. Federal Trade Commission, LS
| The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal Trade = CE
a Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76-17 PERS eo
hE Hobart Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. oo PRE
C.A. No. 76-18 me
| . Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Federal Trade Bd
Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76-20 Ln
a : CPC International Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade ie
Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76-21 SE
3 United States Gypsum Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, NE
| et al., C.A. No. 76-22 - aE
® oy EE et RECREATION	|	. : : aes

| . | Case MDL No.254 Document?	Eiled OB/OLITE Page Soro meme	—	: RE PETRIE PI
a MDL-254 -- Schedule A (cont.) —- p. 2 HE “tn
- Square D. Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al.
Poo Inland Steel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. :	: ts ome Ye Ve TEUSLal rade Lommission, et al
C.A. No. 76-24 .
Oscar Mayer & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission,et al., C.A, No. 76-25 :
i Northwest Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, :	: B - . -
et al., C.A, No. 76-26
: Van Dorn Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. :	: LE Toon =e Ve Efe al trade tommrssion, et al :
C.A. No. 76-36
Co : C.I.T. Financial Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, oo
. et al., C. A. No. 76-39
| Sundstrand Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission et al.	Re Ve feOerdl trade	tommission,	et al
C.A. No. 76-56
a Sundstrand Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. SEC.A. No. 76-60 A ; .
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK = oe
o ) oo Airco, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, :3 et al, C.A. No. 75 Civ. 17 (J. Weinfeld)
] Lear Siegler, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission,
: et al.,, C.A. No. 75 Civ 225 } Jo
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., et al. v. ~~ = =
Federal Trade Commission, et al., C.A. No. 75 Civ. 657
' EEE ESN A EA
White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade ST
- Commission, et al., C.A. No. 75 Civ. 698 : WET
gt Hershey Foods Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, :
et al., C.A, No. 75 Civ. 726 } - -
; ‘International Business Machines Corp., et al. wv, on
Federal Trade Commission, et al., C.A. No.	75 Civ. 743 oo
a The Bendix Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. :
C.A., No. 75 Civ. 744 :
Time, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. oo :

nS MD MERBORVTEBRE.	Fe OpIgS Pade dois TTTECo : - : : EE
i. Deering-Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission ~~ 5%
® et al., C.A. No. 75 Civ. 764. ST re	) Loews Corp. V. Federal Trade Commission, et al. dh
| C.A. No. 75 Civ. 766
SCM Corp. Vv. Federal Trade Commission, et al. SRE
C.A. No. 75 Civ. 781 Co Lo
| Co : Bristol-Myers Co. Vv. Federal Trade Commission, et al. Co
C.A. No. 75 Civ. 782 to Co RENEE
Whirlpool Corp. V. Federal Trade Commission, et al. = = EE
. C.A, No. 75 Civ. 797 : TT
: Times Mirror Co. Vv. Federal Trade Commission, et al. Lo EEE
ge = C.A. No. 75 Civ. 817 | | ER
: Harris Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. oo BE
» C.A. No. 75 Civ. 930 IE
Sh Carnation Co. Vv. Federal Trade Commission, et al. EE
. _ C.A. No. 75 Civ. 1268 NEE TP Se
. Airco, Inc.,	et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. .- :
C.A. No. 76 Civ. 89 TE
C JE _ Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. Vv. BE @	~ Federal Trade Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 128 red
| * American Greetings Corp., et al. v. Federal Trade a FEE
: Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 248 oo EE
: American Can Co., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, SRE
: et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 297 Co CL ey
| Times Mirror Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. CE
: : © Bethlehem Steel Corp.,	et al. v. Federal Trade Commission,	=
: - Ashland 0il, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. . CE
~C. A. No. 76 Civ. 303 I:
" Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. et al.
: C.A. No. 76 Civ. 315° LE
B oo Lowes Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. - A
| C.A. No. 76 Civ. 317 IE | - LAE
he — N te - - : : — —_~

Ce Case MDL No. 254 Document	2 Filed 05/01/15 Page 5 6f 5===
: MDL-254 =~ Schedule A (cont.) -- p. 4 co Le
. i EE A EI E ! ’ . EI :
~ ~~ American Greetings Corp., et al. v. Federal Trade IcS. Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 320
Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission,
et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 340 ) a To
White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade
: . Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 398 : y
a Whirlpool Corp., v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. .
Roper Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. Co
C.A. No. 76 Civ. 435 oo
fe Continental Can Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, |
et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ, 484 ay
Desoto, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. Ca
C.A. No. 76 Civ. 492 REESE
The Sperry	& Hutchinson Co., et al. v. Federal Trade IR
Commission, et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 560 : Co
Whirlpool Corp., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, SE
® et al., C.A. No. 76 Civ. 577 | co
. Morton~-Noxrvich Products, Inc, v. Federal Trade Commission,	. a eee ne eens Va eT O 2 EAUEe LOMMISSIon
L SRE
Lo Bethlehem Steel Corp., et al, v. Federal Trade Commission, .
! et al., C.A, No. 76 Civ. 607 CL
: : Deering-Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade. Commission, et al. ER
ey | Hughes Tool Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. EEoe C.A. No. 76 Civ. 709
~ Macmillan, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. |
: ~~ C.A. No. 76 Civ. 1026 Co
Federal Trade Commission v. Airco, Inc., et al. Co
So Misc. No. M18-304 Co
DISTRICT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - |
Federal Trade Commission v. Air Products and Chemicals,. , et al.. Misc Na Jeon0cd esl LUSLeans
) re et al., Misc. No. 76-0064 :
| : Co . ce
y LL